Eurooppalaiset rahoitusjärjestelyt näyttävät nousevan tikun nokkaan vaalikeskusteluissa. Persukeisari Timo Soini vakuuttaa
Talous on kansainvälistynyt voimakkaasti viimeisten vuosikymmenien aikana. Tämä koskee myös Suomea
Jos euromaat olisivat antaneet Kreikan ja Irlannin kaatua hallitsemattomasti
Vajaa vuosi sitten Kreikan kohdalla tehtiin pikaisesti improvisoitu lainapaketti ja pian sen jälkeen 440 miljardin euron väliaikainen vakausväline ERVV. Suomen osuus näistä on Kreikalle annettavat lainat (nyt 550 miljoonaa) sekä vajaan kahdeksan miljardin takuut. Takuusummaa saatetaan joutua nostamaan lähes kaksinkertaiseksi
Summat ovat todella isoja
Nyt valmistellaan kokonaisratkaisua
Kahden vuoden päästä ERVV on tarkoitus muuttaa pysyväksi 500 miljardin euron EVM:ksi yhtenä osana kokonaisuutta. Koko touhun tarkoituksena on lisätä finanssisektorin vakautta sekä estää valtioiden hallitsematonta velkaantumista.
Näillä eväillä Eurooppa voi välttää sen
Nyt Soini ja eräät muut vastustavat sekä väliaikaista että pysyvää vakausrahastoa. He eivät ota kantaa sen laajemmin kokonaisratkaisuun
Soinin malli ei ehkä ole "Kreikan tie" kuten demarien Jutta Urpilainen on sanonut
Olisikohan tuo suunta eduksi Suomen kehitykselle?
Timo Juurikkala 1.4.2011
Ei muuta kuin oppositioon ja hallituksen kaatoon!!
Googleta: "Eurooppa pyörittää jättimäista pyramidihuijausta"
Hot damn, lokonig pretty useful buddy.
he accepted the women may have felt they were the vimicts of unreasonable force from the victim's partner (Rhea says her partner was only trying to protect her).Since then, I have got hold of a transcript of the sentencing which clearly confirms this was the reason that the judge decided on a suspended sentence rather than sending the attackers to prison.However, two weeks after our article, the story emerged in the national newspapers, where the line about the women being Muslims who were not used to alcohol was given much more prominence.Most of these articles reported that the attackers were freed after the judge heard this evidence. Even though they used the word after instead of the word because these articles clearly implied that the two things were connected.This was misleading and created a perception about this case which is at odds with the facts.Let's have a look at the second point e28093 the fact that the attackers were not charged with a racially aggravated offence. A video on YouTube promoting the EDL demonstration says: This is an obvious racist attack on a white English female, yet it was dealt with quietly and as a drunken thuggish gang attack. It goes on: Unfortunately, many believe that it's not possible to be racist against white people. This is what the Crown Prosecution Service says about its decision: The CPS reviewed all the evidence in this case, including whether a racially aggravated offence should be brought on the basis that the comment white bitch' was reported to have been heard during the incident. However, this racist comment could not be attributed to any particular suspect and was not adopted by the group as a whole. There was therefore no realistic prospect of conviction for a racially aggravated offence. So, clearly the CPS does consider that it is possible to be racist against white people. Its reason not to charge anybody with a racially aggravated offence was purely a legal one. It could not be sure of securing a conviction.The EDL states its central aim is to combat Islamic extremism . However, the women involved in this attack were clearly not Islamic extremists and the incident has nothing whatsoever to do with that issue.One can only conclude that the reason the EDL has leapt up on the misunderstandings about this case is because it actually has a much wider agenda. It is seeking to propagate a message that white English people are becoming second-class citizens in their own country and preferential treatment is given to Muslims.That is, of course, deeply divisive and dangerous stuff which breeds resentment between communities. And, as we have seen, its argument crumbles as soon as one carries out a detailed examination of the facts.At this point, I would add something of a footnote about the Rhea Page case.Like Rhea, I did not agree with the judge's decision to suspend the sentences and I felt that the defendants should have been imprisoned.It was an appalling attack and I think the justice system needs to send out a clear message in such cases that this sort of random, drunken violence will not be tolerated.However, I have absolutely no doubt that the judge's decision was based on a proper and legitimate assessment of the case, and had nothing whatsoever to do with the religious persuasion of the defendants and their lack of tolerance to alcohol.Unfortunately, nothing I have said will dissuade the EDL from carrying out their demonstration.They will come to Leicester on February 4, in a protest which will cost huge amounts of public money to police and will probably hit trade in the city centre. And all of this disruption and potential discord will have been based on an entirely flawed premise. That's not fair on any of us, whatever our race or religion.
Je dislike pas, … Je dislike pas, mais bon, Guerre Terrestre, les ennemis onï»¿ qu’un spawn, tu viens par derriere, rien de bien compliquer a fa0i3Rer; Was this answer helpful?
By dealing together, two of you can address problems of self-esteem and mutual trust. However, it is important to obtain the doctor's opinion first before you take these oral medications because they could have negative side effects around the body.